Agent Intent Credential (AIC)
User Journey
The Agent Intent Credential cryptographically captures and verifies the fundamental objectives, operational framing, and goal functions that guide an AI agent's decision-making and behavior. This credential provides transparent insight into an agent's core purpose, value alignment, and decision-making framework, enabling trust through understanding rather than just behavioral observation.
See It in Action
COMING SOON
Why Verify Agent Intent
The Black Box Problem
Modern AI agents operate with opaque decision-making processes:
Hidden Objectives: Unknown or misaligned goal functions driving behavior
Value Ambiguity: Unclear ethical frameworks and decision priorities
Predictability Gaps: Inability to anticipate agent actions in novel situations
Alignment Risks: Potential for goal drift or value misalignment over time
The Intent Transparency Imperative
Verified intent credentials enable:
Predictable Behavior: Understanding what drives agent decisions
Alignment Verification: Confirmation that agent goals match stated purposes
Trust Through Transparency: Reduced uncertainty about agent motivations
Accountability Frameworks: Clear basis for evaluating agent actions against declared intent
Why zkMe AIC
Privacy-Preserving Intent Verification
Selective Disclosure: Prove specific intent attributes without revealing proprietary business logic
Competitive Protection: Maintain confidentiality of unique operational approaches while demonstrating alignment
Flexible Transparency: Balance between full disclosure and necessary privacy for different stakeholders
Technical Innovation
Intent Hashing: Cryptographic commitment to goal functions and decision frameworks
Version Control: Track intent evolution with immutable audit trails
Cross-Reference Capability: Link intent credentials to related certifications and scope definitions
Real-Time Validation: Verify current intent alignment during agent operations
Comprehensive Framework
Multi-Dimensional Intent Capture: Goals, constraints, values, and decision principles
Stakeholder-Specific Views: Different intent disclosures for users, platforms, and regulators
Dynamic Intent Management: Secure updates and modifications with proper authorization
Interoperable Standards: Compatible with existing AI safety and alignment frameworks
How It Works
For Agent Developers & Principals:
Intent Formulation: Clearly articulate the agent's primary objectives, constraints, and value priorities
Framing Definition: Specify the operational context, ethical boundaries, and decision-making principles
Credential Creation: Generate cryptographically signed intent credentials with version control
Alignment Verification: Obtain third-party validation of intent clarity and ethical alignment
Evolution Tracking: Maintain audit trail of intent modifications and version history
For Users & Interacting Parties:
Intent Discovery: Access agent intent credentials before engagement
Alignment Assessment: Evaluate compatibility between user goals and agent intent
Behavior Prediction: Understand likely agent responses based on declared intent
Trust Calibration: Adjust interaction strategy based on intent transparency
For Platforms & Regulators:
Compliance Verification: Ensure agent intents align with platform policies and regulations
Risk Assessment: Evaluate potential conflicts or misalignments in agent objectives
Incident Analysis: Reference intent credentials during behavioral anomaly investigation
Ecosystem Management: Monitor intent patterns across agent populations
Intent Definition Architecture
Core Objectives → Ethical Framing → Decision Principles → Constraint Definition → Credential Generation → Verification ProofsIntent Components
Core Goal Functions
Primary Objectives: Main goals the agent optimizes for
Success Metrics: How the agent measures goal achievement
Time Horizons: Short-term vs long-term optimization priorities
Trade-off Principles: How the agent balances competing objectives
Operational Framing
Context Understanding: How the agent perceives its operational environment
Role Definition: The agent's understanding of its purpose and responsibilities
Stakeholder Mapping: Recognition of different parties and their interests
Success Conditions: Clear definition of what constitutes successful operation
Ethical & Value Alignment
Value Priorities: Hierarchical ordering of ethical principles
Constraint Adherence: Hard limits on permissible actions
Fairness Frameworks: Approaches to equitable treatment and bias mitigation
Transparency Commitments: Level of explanation and reasoning disclosure
Decision-Making Principles
Risk Tolerance: Approach to uncertainty and potential negative outcomes
Learning Behavior: How the agent adapts and updates its strategies
Cooperation Framing: Approach to multi-agent interactions and collaboration
Conflict Resolution: Methods for handling competing interests or constraints
Technical Implementation
Credential Structure
{
"intentId": "urn:uuid:intent-a1b2c3d4...",
"agentDID": "did:agentry:0x1234...",
"principalDID": "did:agentry:principal:abc123",
"intentVersion": "1.2.0",
"coreObjectives": {
"primaryGoal": "optimize_portfolio_risk_adjusted_returns",
"successMetrics": ["sharpe_ratio", "max_drawdown", "annual_return"],
"optimizationHorizon": "long_term",
"goalHierarchy": ["capital_preservation", "consistent_returns", "growth"]
},
"ethicalFraming": {
"valuePriorities": ["user_interest_first", "regulatory_compliance", "market_stability"],
"hardConstraints": ["no_market_manipulation", "no_insider_trading", "transparent_operations"],
"fairnessPrinciples": ["equal_access", "non_discrimination", "conflict_avoidance"],
"transparencyLevel": "explainable_decisions"
},
"decisionFramework": {
"riskTolerance": "moderate",
"learningApproach": "continuous_improvement_with_human_oversight",
"cooperationModel": "competitive_collaboration",
"conflictResolution": "escalate_to_human_operator"
},
"operationalContext": {
"roleDefinition": "autonomous_portfolio_manager",
"stakeholderRecognition": ["end_users", "regulators", "market_participants"],
"successConditions": ["positive_risk_adjusted_returns", "regulatory_compliance", "user_satisfaction"],
"failureConditions": ["regulatory_violation", "significant_capital_loss", "systemic_risk_contribution"]
},
"verificationMechanisms": {
"alignmentAudit": "completed_2025Q1",
"behavioralMonitoring": "continuous",
"goalDriftDetection": "enabled",
"humanOversight": "required_for_major_changes"
},
"proofs": {
"intentIntegrity": "zkp_intent_789...",
"principalAuthorization": "zkp_principal_123...",
"alignmentVerification": "zkp_alignment_456..."
}
}Verification Architecture
Intent Commitment
Cryptographic hash of intent components creates commitment
Version-controlled updates with changelog and justification
Multi-signature requirements for intent modifications
Behavioral Alignment Monitoring
Continuous comparison of agent actions against declared intent
Anomaly detection for potential goal drift or misalignment
Automated alerts for significant behavioral deviations
Stakeholder Verification
Users can verify specific intent attributes relevant to their interactions
Platforms can validate intent compliance with policies
Regulators can audit intent declarations for compliance
Zero-Knowledge Proof Generation
Agents prove adherence to specific intent principles without full disclosure
Selective revelation of intent components based on verification context
Privacy-preserving demonstration of value alignment
Verification Flow
Intent Proof Request: Verifier requests proof of specific intent alignment
Selective Proof Generation: Agent generates zero-knowledge proof of relevant intent attributes
Cryptographic Validation: Proof verified against committed intent credentials
Trust Decision: Verifier uses validated intent alignment for engagement decisions
Key Benefits
For Agent Developers & Principals
Clear Communication: Transparent articulation of agent purpose and values
Alignment Assurance: Verification that agent behavior matches declared intent
Stakeholder Trust: Build confidence through operational transparency
Risk Mitigation: Reduced liability through clear intent documentation
For Users & Customers
Informed Engagement: Understand agent motivations before interaction
Predictable Behavior: Anticipate agent responses based on declared intent
Value Alignment: Choose agents that share ethical frameworks and priorities
Recourse Clarity: Clear basis for evaluating agent performance against stated goals
For Platforms & Ecosystems
Compliance Management: Verify agent intents align with platform values and policies
Risk Assessment: Evaluate potential conflicts in multi-agent environments
Ecosystem Cohesion: Foster compatible agent interactions through intent transparency
User Protection: Ensure agents operate with user-aligned objectives
For Regulators & Standards Bodies
Oversight Efficiency: Standardized framework for evaluating agent objectives
Compliance Verification: Automated checking of intent alignment with regulations
Market Stability: Monitor for potentially harmful or misaligned agent objectives
Incident Investigation: Clear reference point for analyzing agent behavior
Use Cases to Benefit
Financial Services & DeFi
Trading Agents: Verify profit motives vs market stability considerations
Lending Protocols: Confirm risk assessment frameworks and borrower treatment principles
Portfolio Management: Understand investment philosophies and risk management approaches
Insurance Underwriting: Verify fairness principles and claims handling frameworks
Healthcare & Medical AI
Diagnostic Systems: Confirm patient welfare prioritization and diagnostic conservatism
Treatment Planning: Verify evidence-based approaches and patient preference尊重
Drug Discovery: Understand research ethics and safety prioritization
Medical Imaging: Confirm accuracy optimization and false-positive/false-negative trade-offs
Legal & Compliance Systems
Contract Analysis: Verify neutrality and comprehensive assessment principles
Regulatory Monitoring: Confirm compliance prioritization and reporting integrity
Legal Research: Understand citation quality preferences and precedent weighting
Document Review: Verify thoroughness standards and privilege protection
Enterprise Operations
HR Systems: Confirm fairness principles and diversity commitments
Customer Service: Verify helpfulness prioritization and escalation protocols
Supply Chain Management: Understand efficiency vs resilience trade-offs
Resource Allocation: Confirm equitable distribution principles and optimization goals
Government & Public Services
Resource Allocation: Verify equitable distribution and need-based prioritization
Policy Analysis: Confirm evidence-based approaches and stakeholder consideration
Public Safety: Understand risk assessment frameworks and precautionary principles
Infrastructure Management: Verify public benefit prioritization and sustainability commitments
Consumer Applications
Personal Assistants: Confirm user preference prioritization and privacy respect
Content Recommendation: Understand engagement vs well-being balance
Smart Home Systems: Verify user control principles and safety prioritization
Educational Tools: Confirm learning effectiveness and age-appropriate content
Research & Academic AI
Scientific Discovery: Verify hypothesis testing rigor and reproducibility commitment
Data Analysis: Confirm statistical integrity and interpretation caution
Literature Review: Understand comprehensive coverage and bias awareness
Peer Review Assistance: Verify objectivity and constructive feedback principles
Multi-Agent Systems & Ecosystems
Cooperative AI: Verify collaboration intentions and value alignment
Competitive Environments: Confirm fair competition principles and rule adherence
Federated Learning: Understand data privacy commitments and model improvement goals
Swarm Intelligence: Verify collective benefit vs individual optimization balance
Pricing & Integration
Drop us a line at [email protected] and let’s kick things off!
Last updated